On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:39:14PM +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote: > I don't remember approving them, and I didn't see any request either. > So, by our standards, they are "unintended" :)
Heh, alright. > > The race against 100% is getting fun lately. :) > Yeah. Unfortunately, I've been a bit busy these days, so I wonder if > you or someone else could come up with a proper report so we can bug > gnopernicus developers to revert the change? I'm a bit busy right now to find out culprit commits, etc. If someone else wants to do it, please go ahead. FWIW, my file is now up to date, so I have little personal interest right now :P -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
