On 9/13/05, Roozbeh Pournader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip expected response on flags>
> Are there any other decent ways to do signify language visually? > > The name of the language in its own language (and script) may be the > best thing to do. But even that may be controversial sometimes. For > example, the Azerbaijani speakers in Iran are divided into what their > language should be called in Azerbaijani. Some insist on (a translation > equivalent to) Turkish, others on Azerbaijani, others on Azerbaijani > Turkish, and a few on Azeri. How often is this a problem? i.e., if I wanted to do that for any of the (currently) 14 languages here: http://torrent.gnome.org/ would that be a problem? [The current solution, 'just use english', seems really suboptimal.] > Sorry Luis, this is not an easy question to answer at all. understood. Luis _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
