On 3/3/07, Djihed Afifi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I was under the impression that translators run `make update-po`? I > > just assumed that everything in the po directory was handled by the > > i18n/l10n team. Looking now, several of our .po files have recent > > "POT-Creation-Date"s. Though several have old ones, as well. > > > > Do I need to run `make update-po`? Do I need to do any checking to > > ensure that the .po files aren't adversely affected by running this > > command? I apologize for being so clueless in this area. > > > > Most translation maintainers don't generate pots/pos from sources, they > just grab the updated po's from l10n.gnome.org. The software behind > l10n.gnome.org (damned-lies) generates them using intltool as far as I > see. > > If you update the po's yourself somehow outside, most translators will > override them, as we assume only we work on the po files and > damned-lies. > > I guess the good thing to do is to make intltool catch the strings, > otherwise I think it is a bit too late to inform translators of what > needs to be done, unfortunatly :-( .tarballs due in two days right?
Well, the string in question appears to exist here: http://l10n.gnome.org/POT/tomboy.HEAD/tomboy.HEAD.pot So I think we're good, right? Sandy _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
