Le mardi 10 avril 2007 à 17:01 +0200, Marcel Telka a écrit : > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > > 2007/4/9, Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >Hi all, > > > > > >What about generating 2.20 stats, now that 2.18.1 is about to be > > >released and 2.19.1 is approaching? > > > > > > I think that sounds like a good idea > > > > Should we keep 2.14 stats? > > > > > > We do off course not use them for anything anymore, but they might be nice > > to keep so that we can see how our translation effort have developed. So I > > But this is not obvious from the status page, AFAIK. A beginner could be > confused and start to translate gnome 2.14 stuff... > > I am voting (if I could) for gnome 2.14 removal.
I just added 2.20 release. For now, I'm letting 2.14, but I added a short description with each release, see http://l10n.gnome.org/releases/ If Danilo is reading, please tell me how to change the order of items on this page. I kept the branches for: <module id="glib" branch="glib-2-12"/> <module id="gtk+" branch="gtk-2-10"/> <module id="ekiga" branch="gnome-2-14"/> Just tell me if you know something about them. Claude _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n