Hi, On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 14:28 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> So if gnome-vfs is not going to be fix, you can : > - fix each program (that's what i did > http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-system-monitor/branches/gnome-2-14/src/util.c?r1=1159&r2=1205 > ) I would even rate that patch as wrong. Users should not be confronted with binary prefixes. Doing so is considered legacy behavior. So this patch should divide by multiples of thousands and use kB, MB and GB. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefixes#Usage_notes There are certainly some cases where binary prefixes are not avoidable and perhaps it would be a good idea to use the correct symbols then. But I think it would be wrong to enforce binary prefixes on the GNOME users when it comes to file sizes. But seriously, this discussion should be taken elsewhere. Sven _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n