I don't known if this is very correct, but i use lines as: \parskip=0mm% \staffbotmarg9\Interligne%
Andre ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Pierre Coulon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Werner Icking Music Archive" <tex-music@icking-music-archive.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:56 AM Subject: [TeX-Music] "ragged" piece end. >I want to finish a piece with an incomplete last system with a \vbox, as > Olivier explained: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02270.html > > How can I provide regular system spacings in my page without adding a > \vskip's by tedious calculations? > > Regards, > > Jean-Pierre Coulon E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > TeX-music mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.daimi.au.dk/mailman/listinfo/ten as attached in my previous mail. > > > > The code to read contents of a file and set it in the composer is been > > around for a long time. > > > > String and document changes have to be done. Radhika has agreed to > > document this before the release. > > > > My worry on why this has to go through is : Because, the user will not > > know what is happening. And some distros ship experimental plugins as > > well. the plugin can be moved to experimental again, and if distros ship experimental, they should understand what "experimental" means. > > In case this is not approved, should the mentioning of this be dropped > > from Release Notes or from anywhere ? yes. > Okay, so the code does have a fair amount of testing; ...while the patch we discuss has not had enough testing. the new error strings we discuss here are not even marked for translation (i don't talk about listing them in POTFILES.in, i talk about the error files). and for me it's too late to come up with this only one week before hardcode freeze. > I'm still uneasy > about it, but it does sound like it might be the lesser of two evils. > I'll give one of 2 approvals. i won't give an approval on this. i prefer to move the plugin to experimental and add a comment to the 2.22.0 release notes of evo so distros can ship it if interested. other r-t members might differ of course. :-) so, current status: 1 of 2 approvals from i18n and 1 of 2 approvals from r-t. andre -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper >
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
