On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Claude Paroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le vendredi 29 février 2008 à 15:37 -0600, Brian Cameron a écrit : > > > I would like to request a string freeze break for GDM 2.20. Since > > GDM 2.22 was not approved for inclusion in GNOME 2.22, I would like > > to get some fixes into GDM 2.20 that would be nice to address, but > > affect strings. I plan to do a new GDM 2.20 release sometime in > > the near future so that people can get the latest bug fixes when > > they upgrade to GNOME 2.22. > > > > Can I get approval to fix the following bugs with the attached > > patches? > > > > - The documentation needs to be updated to explain that the Custom > > Widgetry interface broke slightly due to moving away from using > > vicious-extensions and moving towards gkeyfile. > > > > - Bug 477881, fix GDM to honor the default password character > > rather than hardcoding it to the '*' character > > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477881 > > As this contains some security implication, I would say this is worth > committing, as if we don't do it upstream, distros will patch > downstream... > Approval 1 of 2 for i18n. > > > > - Improve tooltip in gdmgreeter > > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389734 > > > > I notice that, by accident, I committed the 2nd patch (tt.diff) > > to GDM 2.20.3. If I don't get approval, I can back this out > > of the next release. > > This one seems minor to me. But if the first change is approved, I think > we could also let one more string. > > Claude
Approval 2 of 2. _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n