Hi! Am Dienstag, den 22.07.2008, 10:54 +0200 schrieb Åsmund Skjæveland: > > I have seen "35mm equivalent" used. I think that's easier to understand > than just "35mm". Then you would perhaps not need the "(lens)" in the > first string, but something "(actual focal length)" works better with > "35mm equivalent", although it's hard to explain how focal length works > and converts between different sensor sizes in two sentence stubs :) >
Well, yes "35mm equivalent" would probably be the more correct term. The problem with this and "actual focal length" is that they are pretty long. As we already have a width issue in EOG's property dialog I tried to keep it as short as possible and the proposal for this variant looked pretty good to me. Generally I would say the people interested in this value know what is behind these values. But we'll see what userland is going to say about this. :-) Felix
_______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
