Le mercredi 23 juillet 2008, à 10:55 +0100, Thomas Wood a écrit : > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 22:02 -0300, Leonardo F. Fontenelle wrote: > > Em Ter, 2008-07-22 às 22:48 +0200, Claude Paroz escreveu: > > > Le mar 22 jui 2008 22:09:39 CEST, Thomas Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > [...] > > > The problem is that strings from gnome-backgrounds didn't change for > > > long, and are freezed from GNOME 2.12 on! > > > If you want to change/add strings, you'll have to branch > > > gnome-backgrounds first (probably a gnome-2-22 branch). > > > > > > > Maybe there's no need for branching (this time). GNOME 2.22.3 was > > already released, so this "string freeze break" won't affect anyone. It > > surely would be unnacceptable if the strings were added before we > > released GNOME 2.22.3. IIRC, gnome-user-docs don't branch because it's > > updated only after GNOME 2.xx.3 is released. > > > > Exactly, I wasn't planning on doing any concurrent development, so I > didn't see any need to branch. I specifically timed my changes so they > where after the last stable release of 2.22. > > We are currently in a period where there are no string freezes in place > (except perhaps for stable branches, where they exist). I suggest that > your string freeze notification script is slightly broken for the case > that a module does not make a stable branch!
Well, the fact that there's no more GNOME 2.22.x release doesn't mean there won't be any new gnome-backgrounds 2.22.x release (although I'm the first one to admit that there won't be any new gnome-backgrounds 2.22.x release ;-)). I can also think of distributors who will download translations from trunk thinking they'll get translations for 2.22 while they'll get translations for 2.23... So a stable branch is still welcome. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n