Hi; On dim, 2008-09-07 at 09:18 -0300, Leonardo F. Fontenelle wrote: > CC'ing the epyphany-extensions maintainer, as this module has a similar > situation. > > Em Dom, 2008-09-07 às 11:05 +0100, John Carr escreveu: > > [...] > > > > Which branch is normally shown on gnome-extras? If its normally a > > stable branch, then gnome-2-24, otherwise trunk... > > Usually it's trunk, because most modules in gnome-extras don't have any > branch. Epiphany Extensions does have a gnome-2-24 branch, but trunk is > being shown in the gnome-extras page. > > When GNOME 2.24.0 is released, many languages will not have translated > conduit (or epiphany-extensions) yet. Then the teams will have some > months to complete the UI translation and start translating the > documentation. > > As a translator, I'd prefer to have the gnome-2-24 branch exposed in > l10n.gnome.org, at least until GNOME 2.24.3 is released. Then I'd rather > have branch exposed, to start working on GNOME 2.26.
The situation with epiphany-extensions is that while it's not itself in the Gnome desktop suite, it tracks a module (epiphany) that is in the desktop, and thus there will always be a branch for an epiphany branch, plus trunk to track epiphany trunk. So only having one branch of e-e on d-l is a bit inconvenient. I guess the same issue now exists for other modules in the Gnome desktop, e.g. gedit with gedit-plugins and seahorse with seahorse-plugins ? Christian _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n