I'll take a wager of one pint (beer or ice cream) that this does not in fact get fixed the right way by the next GUADEC. Sorry, but experience shows that half-assed fixes stay in the codebase forever because fixing it the right way becomes a much lower priority once the half-assed fix is in place...
Luis (pessimist) On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:40 AM, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Samstag, den 20.09.2008, 07:58 +0200 schrieb Claude Paroz: >> Even if it's VERY late in cycle, if it's a bug, it should be corrected. >> So 1 of 2 approval from gnome-i18n, on condition that vuntz share his >> ice cream with me. >> >> Claude > > r-t approval 1 of 2. > > andre > -- > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | failed > http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper > > _______________________________________________ > release-team mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team > _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
