2009/3/15 Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org>: > On 03/15/2009 09:49 AM, Kenneth Nielsen wrote: >> >> 2009/3/15 Behdad Esfahbod<beh...@behdad.org>: >>> >>> On 03/15/2009 09:44 AM, Jorge González González wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> El dom, 15-03-2009 a las 14:30 +0100, Christian Persch escribió: >>>>> >>>>> Hi; >>>>> >>>>> Absence of ChangeLog, po/ChangeLog and help/ChangeLog etc. means that >>>>> the module in question does not use changelogs. (For example, >>>>> this is the case for epiphany, epiphany-extensions, gucharmap, >>>>> gnome-terminal, gnome-games.) However, some translators still add >>>>> changelog entries to modules that do not have ChangeLog files, adding >>>>> them to po/ChangeLog.pre-X-Y or ChangeLog.old etc. These files are, as >>>>> their name already indicates, not to be modified further. Please stop >>>>> doing this. >>>> >>>> didn't we agree that the standard was to have them? >>> >>> What standard? The norm currently is to have them, yes. But if a module >>> doesn't have it, there's good reason for it. >> >> Like what? > > Why does it matter?
Well if there is no good reason, then it would sure make my job easier if they could comply, so I could commit to all modules in the same way. Remember that I have to commit to more than 80 modules. > > behdad > _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n