Hi! Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachys...@gmail.com>, Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:29:13 +0300:
> I think if it's not intended to be translated then it shouldn't be put > in translation files at all (like HTML tags, gconf key names etc.) Well, when we look at commercially localized software, we see that those types of strings tend to be internationalized, and thus localized. Surely, the thing is that in commercial l10n, the given legal string l10n is managed, not so surprisingly, by legal experts. As far as I know, vendors like Red Hat or Novell also outsource professional legal text l10n in their open source products that are otherwise not localized commercially. Then, there's a world of community l10n, so... > Anyway I'm interested in official GNOME position too. I propose to contact gnome-legal, or e.g. the Software Freedom Law Center, probably through the GNOME Foundation, as was already suggested. The gnome-i18n is in my opinion not the right place to discuss legal matters. Cheers Petr Kovar _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n