Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 10:38 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit : > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 16:08 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote: > > Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 09:57 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit : > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > gnome-user-docs isn't listed on l10n.gnome.org. > > > > It is: http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gnome-user-docs/ > > So it is. But I don't see it linked from here: > > http://l10n.gnome.org/module/
It is listed as GNOME 2 User Documentation. > > It's a bit difficult to configure this currently in l10n.gnome.org, as > > we have not a per-branch domain setting. Do you plan to keep the old > > guides in the master branch? Or will you move them in the tree? > > The old documents aren't in the build. The configure script > only outputs a Makefile for gnome-help. But now that I think > about it, my guess is that DL just greps Makefile.am files, > without regard for configure.ac. (Blip does the same.) > > I'll 'git rm' some files so they stop showing up in DL. Thanks, it appears now correctly. Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 16:58 +0100, Gabor Kelemen a écrit : >Besides, it could be useful to keep them around for a while, for > example, a lot of accessibility-guide's content could be recycled into > orca's help, perhaps some teams still had no time to do that. They are still on gnome-2-x branches. > Claude: perhaps we could simply register a new module with another name > (gnome-help or something), using the same git module, and the new > document directory? Then the current g-u-d module can be left alone. It works now with the current setup. When a docs directory does not exist, D-L simply skip it. Cheers, Claude -- www.2xlibre.net _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n