Le mardi 11 septembre 2012 à 03:55 -0400, Chris Leonard a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Claude Paroz <cla...@2xlibre.net> wrote: > > >> The importance of this is that WebKitGTK+ is not presently a member of > >> any Release Set (other than OLPC) and it is not getting the L10n it > >> deserves. > >> > >> Yes, it is absolutely true that WebKitGTK+ has other issues with it's > >> i18n at present, but making it more visible can only help that i18n > >> issue get the attention it requires. > > > > There are several other external packages that contain visible strings > > in GNOME (notably those hosted on the Translation Project). We (I?) > > choose at some point to limit ourselves to GNOME git + some freedesktop > > translation stats. It's somewhat arbitrary and we can decide to change > > it or add more exceptions. But generally-speaking I find it rather > > frustrating to have statistics on packages you may have to wait several > > months before anyone react upstream :-/ > > > > As for WebKitGTK+, it's not an option to make it more visible until DL > > can generate a proper POT file. The last time it succeeded was on > > 2010-12-27! > > Yes, I am painfully aware of the failure of WebKitGTK+ to provide an > adequate fix for their i18n issue. Part of my reasoning for wanting > it to make it more visible (other than the fact that all GNOME-based > web-browsing depends on it) is to draw greater attention to the i18n > issue.
Hey Gil, stuff for your next blog post :-) Claude _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n