Hey, just a little update on this. Since I didn't get approval from i18n, I went ahead and released nautilus 3.7.92 without the string changes for now. As there are no other code changes involved, I think it's fine to commit that before 3.8.0, should the change be approved and the n-s-t part merged/released as well in time.
Cheers, Cosimo On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 13:20 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > > Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Cosimo Cecchi <cosi...@gnome.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > Patches are on the bug report, feedback and comments appreciated. > > > > > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680983 > > > > > > > > > > Any opinion on this? > > > No 3.7 tarball of nautilus-sendto has been released yet, and I'm > planning > > > to release nautilus 3.7.92 later today, so there would still > potentially be > > > time for the change to be included in this release. > > > > > > Even if I didn't spell it explicitly in my previous message, the change > > > implies an UI freeze break request for nautilus-sendto, and a string > freeze > > > break request for nautilus. > > > > I'd prefer to remove nautilus-sendto from 3.8; it's in my opinion way > > too late in the schedule to get those changes in and appropriately > > tested. > > Those changes are based on the existing nautilus-sendto code, they're > nicely separated, and they've been better tested than nautilus-sendto > had the chance to be in the past couple of releases. > > > Still, I'd let this slip in, be tested in .92, translated, and removed > > from 3.8.0 if necessary. > > Cool. FWIW, the only string changes are the 2 strings in nautilus, > there's nothing more to translate in nautilus-sendto itself. > > >
_______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
