Translators, we just completed the migration to a different storage backend, please let us know whether how that contributed to speed up your day-to-day operations.
Thanks! Il giorno ven 1 mag 2020 alle ore 14:07 Andrea Veri <a...@gnome.org> ha scritto: > > Claude, > > Your statements are pretty unfair I have to be honest. The current issue is > that glusterfs doesn't seem to perform well when trying to cope with big > repositories such as gtk or gimp. The solution there is mainly moving this > data out of it into the brand new Ceph cluster we deployed and blogged about > [1] recently. > > Openshift is a platform that we introduced for the community and used / loved > by multiple contributors as of today. It introduced, as every new technology, > a learning curve that has to be filled before the actual features can become > of good use. Saying I want to go back to a plain VM is the old please give me > back a bare metal because I want all the performances for myself when the > world transitioned off to virtual machines ages ago. It doesn't scale, adds > maintenance burdens, and it's definitely unnecessary. > > The GNOME Infrastructure Team has made sure l10n runs beautifully with the > new platform with a service degradation that only happened during the > datacenter migration we recently performed and fixed right afterwards. On top > of that we made sure the entire VM to container migration was performed in > its *entirety* by us, we offered our help to let you understand how the > platform works to get you up to speed with little to no interest from your > side. We keep mentioning on IRC and other mediums we're around to offer our > knowledge in order to fullfil your needs when it comes to maintaining this > service properly. > > That said, we'll look into moving that volume into Ceph late next week. > > [1] > https://www.dragonsreach.it/2020/03/30/2020-03-30-gnome-infrastructure-updates > > Il gio 30 apr 2020, 22:24 Claude Paroz <cla...@2xlibre.net> ha scritto: >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Looks like the stats ar now OK again. >> I'm sorry for that (it also happened for gtk recently). There is a major >> problem right now with the D-L hosting. The disk performance of the >> hosting platform is not sufficient for D-L needs (much slower than my >> 9-year old personal machine!). >> >> I'm convinced the GNOME sysadmin team is working hard on the >> infrastructure, but since D-L moved to the OpenShift platform, it >> occasioned a lot of issues and I spent more time on it that I would want. >> I'm pleading to get back to a traditional VM infrastructure, but I'm not >> the one who can decide this currently. >> So sorry for you translators, hopefully we can find a solution in a not >> too far future. >> >> Claude >> >> Le 30.04.20 à 11:40, Daniel Mustieles García via gnome-i18n a écrit : >> > Hi Claude, >> > >> > I've noticed Evolution stats in DL are not being updated. Doing it >> > manually also doesn't work. >> > >> > Last update was done 2 days ago so changes done yesterday are not >> > reflected. >> > >> > Could you please review it. >> > >> > Thanks in advance! >> > >> > https://l10n.gnome.org/module/evolution/ -- Cheers, Andrea Red Hatter, Fedora / EPEL packager, GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator, Former GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary, GNOME Foundation Membership & Elections Committee Chairman Homepage: https://www.gnome.org/~av _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
