On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Jeff Schroeder <jeffschroe...@computer.org> wrote: > Thats just a good recent example. Combobox is a Dell 1U server which > I'll have to recommend as they are better bang for the buck without > skimping quality. The ILO stuff isn't as schmexy as the HP or > Sun^WOracle servers, but the price point is right and the quality is > very good. They extended warranties are also well cheap.
Without going into nearly the same detail as Jeff, I agree that another machine like combobox would be great. I think, between two such machines, we would be able to replace all of the unsupported hardware. This should allow us to segregate services into VMs and better manage resources per-service. I also agree that a setup like this would fix the issue we have with fixed.g.o. Anytime builds start up on that machine it becomes completely unresponsive. One or two dedicated build VMs would be a nicer solution. I think the biggest concern really is that nearly all of the hardware is end of life so we're just asking for a disaster. One more new machine lets us safely move all these services onto supported hardware. Christer _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
