From: Frederic Peters <[email protected]> > Jeff Schroeder wrote: > >> [...] >> It is commonly called swapdeath. The best 2 ways out of it are a sysrq >> kill all tasks or a reboot. Putting these builders on RHEL6 vms will >> be a welcome move forward. > > Could it be rebooted, then?
Yes please. > As we march towards 3.0 build.gnome.org will be very important to keep > track of build failures, and having it down is a major inconvenience. > > Perhaps fixed.gnome.org could be limited to running the build master, > and another host would act as slave? I personally agree. I think that this is a good compromise solution until the "leftover dbus processes" is solved. > Also there is the general issue of the difficulty to add build slaves, > at a time where they would be quite useful, so it would be really nice > if https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621236 was addressed. BTW: have you removed build-bridade-list from the receipts for any reason? (I haven't readded it waiting for a answer). BR === API ([email protected]) _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
