On 2009/12/07 1:59 PM Charles Marcus wrote:
On 12/7/2009, Larry Gusaas ([email protected]) wrote:
On 2009/12/07 5:47 AM Charles Marcus wrote:
Yes, but those are DEV builds. Beta builds are LABELED as such... I
know, I've downloaded plenty of them in tha past few years...
OOO320_m2 was also labelled as Beta.
And I do recall seing it - but I haven't seen another 'official beta'
since then.
It was removed a while ago since the newer builds supersede it.
I don't meran to be argumentative, but BUILDS are NOT the same as
'official betas', which are labeled something like 'beta#', not 'm#'.
Usually true, but not in this case. This quote is from the announcement
for m2:
"I've uploaded developer snapshot build OOO320_m2. This is a usual
Dev Build but as agreed in the Release Status Meeting it will be
used as OOo 3.2 beta release."
The latests is OOO320_m7. OOO320_m8, which will be built next week
will likely become RC1.
Same thing goes for RC's... an official RC is labeled RC#, not 'm#'.
It will still be labelled 'm#'. For example, the current OpenOffice.org
3.1.1. release is named OOO310m19 (Build: 9420)
The Release team will decide next Monday if OOO320_m8 will be released
as RC1.
--
Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website: http://larry-gusaas.com
"An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind theirs." -
Edgard Varese
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
gnome-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
