Great !!! Pablo
2012/9/13 Alexander Larsson <[email protected]> > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:08 -0400, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > I don't think glick2 is a perfect fit as is. It has some weak aspects, > > like the lack of sandboxing and an over-reliance on fuse (with > > possible performance/robustness/security issues), and some strong ones > > (support for integrating apps with the desktop (desktop files, > > mimetypes, etc) and in-memory deduplication of files). I'd like to > > hear some implementation details on what Lennart has been looking at > > though. Maybe we can merge the best from both worlds. See [1] for > > techincal details on Glick2. > > I just wrote a different, extremely minimal approach to a bundling > system: > > https://github.com/alexlarsson/bundler > > It basically just loopback mounts a squashfs file in a private mount > namespace in a hardcoded place and execs a hardcoded binary name from > it. There is no desktop integration and no other flexibility, although > things like that *could* be introduced by a separate daemon that > extracts metadata from "installed" bundles. > > Not sure this is exactly what we want either, but it might be > interesting to compare and contrast. > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-os-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-os-list >
_______________________________________________ gnome-os-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-os-list
