On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Nikita Churaev <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 15:19 +0200, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote: >> On 22 May 2013 14:52, Nikita Churaev <[email protected]> wrote: >> > http://www.gnome.org/news/2013/03/gnome-3-8-jon-mccann-talks-of-future-in-gnome >> > >> > ...We've reached the end of the utility of the package based mentality >> > that has been effective at getting us to where we are now... >> > >> > What does "package based mentality" mean and why is it bad? >> >> Read these two Ingo Molnar posts for a "non-GNOME" perspective on the issue: >> >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/109922199462633401279/posts/HgdeFDfRzNe >> https://plus.google.com/u/0/109922199462633401279/posts/VSdDJnscewS >> >> Rui > > Why can't the situation be improved without removing dependency > resolution and system-wide libraries? Isn't this the problem of > standardization and unification? Eg. if all distributions used RPM
Where is this world where all distros agree on everything, including package managers? I would really want to rather live in that world. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ gnome-os-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-os-list
