Thanks for the kind reply Allan, its great to hear about the progress we are making with the initiatives around GNOMEOS,
My question was maybe more about if the engagement team should start to use the term GNOMEOS in our work, as I understand was an important part of the "plan" in the 2012 presentation. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Allan Day <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Oliver, > > Oliver Propst <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > > What parts of the initiative are working, should we try to make a new > > stronger commitment to the original ideas or are we happy with the > situation > > today as described on the wiki [2] ? > ... > > "GNOME OS" is a label that we used to describe a collection of > complementary efforts, like having continuous testing, sandboxed > applications and a cohesive application developer experience. We're > actually making good progress in most of these areas: OSTree and GNOME > Continuous are getting more advanced all the time, we're pushing > forward with the application developer experience, and the foundations > for sandboxed applications are being laid by the team who have been > working on kdbus. > > If you would like to help in these areas, there is certainly plenty to > do, and I'd recommend that you look into each of the areas of work to > get more information. > > Best, > > Allan > -- -mvh Oliver Propst
_______________________________________________ gnome-os-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-os-list
