On Tue, Sep 9, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > I think the OpenEmbedded project does a pretty good job of this. It's > designed *explicitly* to be a toolbox, and not like many of the > "traditional" distributions in a confused state as to whether it's a > toolbox or a product.
That said, I'm really uncertain about the vision of GNOME providing binaries where we provide an expectation of security updates. There's a huge amount of infrastructure there that we just don't have. I was more just providing the rationale for why I chose to base Continuous on OpenEmbedded. _______________________________________________ gnome-os-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-os-list
