Maybe what's needed is a name change; a little re branding like, say, gnome++. Just kidding!!
Realistically; this is version 1.0 of a new platform, and for the most part only suited for we "early adopters". I for one am looking forward to building extensions and apps in JavaScript (if I can get over the css hump). That's what open source is all about. This isn't a fedora list but I'd like to point out that fedora is "experimental", anyone using it for production accepts the consequences of being bleeding edge. Anyone who risks their company's assets on an experimental OS version should be FIRED! mikem On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:24 AM, JB <jb.1234a...@gmail.com> wrote: > G. Michael Carter <mikey@...> writes: > > > ... > > My first look at Gnome-Shell was I thought it was a piece of crap. Good > for > those who have never used a computer or have a touch screen but utterly > useless > to a tech like me who spends most of his time in several terminal windows. > > (The sometimes 5-10 second delay to bring up the overview page, after the > systems been running for a few hours, didn't help... ) > > > > I described the switching between active windows and finding hidden menus > underneath them as an act of a circus clown juggling the balls :-) > > > But then I realized Gnome 3.0 is more like Gnome-Shell 1.0. All the > cool > > 3rd party stuff we've been using for Gnome 2.x just hasn't caught up yet. > I > > dare say soon after (or maybe before) F15 release we're going to see a > pile > > of extensions. > > I hope that the GNOME 3 devs do something about the menu system, without > waiting for users to come to their own rescue by writing extensions. > > > With my user community I've got a split from the non-techical users. My > > mother told me, to tell you guys to stop mucking with what works and > change it > > back. > > Your mother deserves a lot of respect. She knows, probably intuitively, > that > age is to be respected, even if it applies to a somewhat "oldie" GNOME 2. > > > Where my wife says she loves it. She finds it much better than the > clunky > > gnome 2.x > > Well, she is your wife. You have to repect her too, otherwise ... :-) > > > With this in mind it might be helpful to be able to select the fallback > > screen as a default for those who just aren't ready to take the plunge. > > We the "techies" will probably survive somehow, but we are concerned about > the "unwashed" non technical broad users base for whom a computer is only > a tool, whose usefulness is measured by "do not get in my way, babe !". > > JB > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list >
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
