Considering Unity IS GNOME, that name would just cause confusion. If such a thing were done I would think it should be called Shubuntu (for the shell). I don't know why it would need a major respin once Ubuntu goes to GNOME 3 for its next version, anyway. There's no Epubuntu for replacing Firefox with GNOME's Epiphany.
I also don't think this is the proper place to discuss it anyway. > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:43:27 +0200 > From: marc.fouq...@gmx.de > To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > Subject: "Gubuntu" - Long term perspective for Ubuntu with Gnome? > > If Ubuntu sticks with Unity, do you think that there is a chance we > might see a "Gubuntu" distribution, similar to Kubuntu and Xubuntu in > the long run? > > I got used to Ubuntu, so I don't like to switch to another distro. But I > tried Natty/Unity yesterday and didn't like it - at least in its current > form. Installing Gnome 3 from an experimental PPA does not appear like a > long-term solution either. > > Regards, > Marc > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
