On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Giovanni Campagna <[email protected]> wrote: > Il giorno dom, 11/09/2011 alle 16.40 -0400, Owen Taylor ha scritto: >> On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 14:57 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:24:18AM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Owen Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Some review comments reading the code to sweettooth-plugin: >> > >> > What is/will be the status for GNOME 3.2? I'm writing (together with >> > others) the release notes and I'd like to say something about this. >> > >> > even if not for GNOME 3.2, we could put it in the "looking forward" >> > section (but then really brief) >> > >> > if it is going to be ready, some screenshots would be nice. Ok to give >> > me links and so on or tell me how to create screenshots. >> >> The client side stuff is largely there to make the site work, but it's >> not widely tested yet, and the server side is still very much a work >> in progress. >> >> I think what makes sense is to have the site as a bit of a stealth-beta >> for this release ... something we're still working on, something we >> don't advertise as a release feature, but something that you can already >> use. > > Which means that extension.gnome.org will be up and running (even if > beta) in 3.2? > I'm asking because I want to move my extensions to the website as soon > as possible, and I'd like to know for how long I'll need to make tarball > releases. I already skipped 3.1.90 / 3.1.91, hoping to have the website > soon, but distro packagers will need 3.1.92 and 3.2.0 if they have to > keep the packages. > > Giovanni >
For now, keep building tarballs. -- Jasper _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
