Am Mi 22 Aug 2012 12:57:12 CEST schrieb Jonathan Wilkes:
----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Tauno Williams <awill...@whitemice.org>
To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 6:23 AM
Subject: Re: Gnome Shell Extensions isn't shipped with Gnome Shell, WHY?!
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:12 +0200, Florian Scandella wrote:
I like how gnome uses
(and drives) development of freedesktop standards instead of reinventing
everything and hacking arount short term limitations.
+1
So while i'm happy with gnome-shell, i'm all for integrating some
of the
most used extensions into the core, with an option to enable/disable them.
I disagree, core should remain thin so people can easily go in whatever
direction they want. Verses the old first-I-go-remove-all-this-crap.
How much "thicker" does the core get by having a restart menu item in the
status menu?
-Jonathan
Note that distributions can bundle and enable whatever extensions they
want. openSUSE packages several. And distribution packages of GNOME
are what end-users actually install and use.
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
As far is i know, the poweroff/reboot buttons were removed/are hidden
because
suspend is a) more efficient (time + powerconsumption) b) many people
only use
suspend and never poweroff there macine c) suspend is working an nearly
all devices
(most of the time a shutdown my notebook using a terminal )
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list