Thanks, Michele, for bringing this up. I hope Jasper or someone else will be able to clarify this.
Vadim. gnome-shell-list-requ...@gnome.org wrote: >Send gnome-shell-list mailing list submissions to > gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > gnome-shell-list-requ...@gnome.org > >You can reach the person managing the list at > gnome-shell-list-ow...@gnome.org > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of gnome-shell-list digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: GS 3.9 affectsInputRegion (Michele) > 2. Re: Fedora 19 and Gnome 3.8 (Andrew Douglas Pitonyak) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:35:00 +0100 >From: Michele <mic...@gmail.com> >To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org >Subject: Re: GS 3.9 affectsInputRegion >Message-ID: > <cahdgf6jweg12qzh0hw8xgd_r53c98vee1gpywqtuqnrgfrp...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >Hi, > >Whilst trying to keep updated the dash-to-dock extension for >Gnome-Shell >3.9 I stumble on the removing of the affectsInputRegion parameter. I'm >wondering if the solution suggested by Vadim - using the private method >layoutManager._trackActor instead of layoutManager.trackChrome to force >the >tracking of an actor whose parent is not tracked - is correct or not. >Can >doing this cause any problem? > >Michele > >on 10/072013 22:56:00 -0500 Vadim wrote: > >>Hi Jasper, >> >>Yes, I kind of do. The parent actor is GenericContainer, and its >position >is fixed. Its children are placed inside the parent at some positions. >I >just searched through my installed extensions and found out that, for >example, Dash to Dock uses similar concept to position the dash: there >is >St.Bin with a child positioned vertically at center, and St.Bin is >added >using addChrome with affectsInputRegion = false, while for its child >trackChrome with affectInputRegion = true is called. >> >>Probably, it is the right decision to simplify the whole thing about >input >regions. May be if, for example, trackChrome could add a region that is >a >descendant of Main.uiGroup but has no tracked ancestors, that would >solve >the problem. >> >>As I can see right now when trackChrome(B) is called, it looks for B's >ancestor A that is already being tracked. Then the only thing I see how >A >is used is to copy A's params to B -- those that are not specified for >B >directly. Is there another thing I am missing why trackChrome would >require >such ancestor? >> >>Vadim. >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: ><https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shell-list/attachments/20130913/425c21a4/attachment.html> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:46:05 -0400 >From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak <and...@pitonyak.org> >To: "gnome-shell-list@gnome.org" <gnome-shell-list@gnome.org> >Subject: Re: Fedora 19 and Gnome 3.8 >Message-ID: <52328a7d.9040...@pitonyak.org> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > >I had forgotten the "minimize" key, thanks! > > >On 09/11/2013 09:26 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: >> hi; >> >> have you tried using Super + H? it's usually faster than clicking a >> minimize button. >> >> ciao, >> Emmanuele. >> >> On 11 September 2013 14:24, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak ><and...@pitonyak.org> wrote: >>> On 09/09/2013 10:59 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 21:17 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: >>>>> I really miss the minimize button on the window, but at least you >can >>>>> use a hot key (if you can remember it). >>>> Minimization doesn't work very well in GNOME 3 -- I'd recommend >making >>>> the most of your infinite workspaces -- but if you want the button >back, >>>> just install gnome-tweak-tool. Look under "Shell" -> "arrangement >of >>>> buttons on the titlebar" >>> They sure did improve the tweak tool since I last looked at it.... >Thanks >>> for the tip. I rarely feel like I NEED minimize, but when I do, I >really >>> want it. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Andrew Pitonyak >>> My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt >>> Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gnome-shell-list mailing list >>> gnome-shell-list@gnome.org >>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list >> >> > >-- >Andrew Pitonyak >My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt >Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php > > > >------------------------------ > >Subject: Digest Footer > >_______________________________________________ >gnome-shell-list mailing list >gnome-shell-list@gnome.org >https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list > > >------------------------------ > >End of gnome-shell-list Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8 >***********************************************
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
