On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 18:58 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> If it does everything the current VFS does and does it faster (or less
> complicated) then I see no reason why we wouldn't switch. Gnome-VFS
> already links in D-Bus if you are using HAL with it so one less
> dependency sounds good. D-Bus should be 1.0 soon or at least the API's
> won't be changing all that drastically. Of course the switch will
> depend on how well the dbus version works.
The hal dependency is optional though. I don't want a required
dependency until D-Bus goes 1.0, or otherwise guarantees ABI.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's an ungodly soccer-playing Green Beret who dotes on his loving old ma.
She's a mistrustful mutant Hell's Angel who can talk to animals. They fight
crime!
_______________________________________________
gnome-vfs-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
