On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 19:01 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> Reload bug #123472 and you'll see some info. I hadn't understood Dave
> and Alex's comments, but now I do. Basically, you can also get canceled
> after open(2) returns, and the code doesn't handle that.
>
> I'm extracting some interesting debug logs after adding a bunch of
> printf()s, so I think I'll have it fixed soon.
>
> Now I delay the closing of canceled open()s until we are back in the
> dispatch_job_callback() for the main thread, since that is the only
> place where it can be done without race conditions.
>
> However, with my new patch the code accesses a structure that has
> already been freed - I'm investigating that.
The latest patch doesn't look right either. I added some comments to the
bug. It seems unlikely that we can get a large change like this in 2.12.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's a bookish white trash ex-con with a winning smile and a way with the
ladies. She's a warm-hearted motormouth politician with someone else's
memories. They fight crime!
_______________________________________________
gnome-vfs-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
