On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 21:27 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 15.09.2006, 10:53 +0200 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
>
> > Maybe we should instead
> > track the methods loaded by module name instead of method name? That way
> > it would automatically work. (And we won't be opening a GModule twice.)
>
> I think changing the way modules are initialized/shutdown is not really
> an option at this stage of platform maturity. Yeah, this particular bit
> of the API might not have been used very often, but maybe some modules
> out there rely on being initialized for all their methods, possibly for
> initializing extra libraries on the fly.
I guess. Its what should have been done initially though...
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's a jaded native American gentleman spy who hides his scarred face behind a
mask. She's a bloodthirsty goth single mother descended from a line of
powerful witches. They fight crime!
_______________________________________________
gnome-vfs-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
