On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 13:51 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 12:38 +0000, Damon Chaplin wrote:
> > You're probably always going to need type, server and share though, so > > maybe you can make it a bit more readable: > > > > ~/.mounts/smb:$server:$share/dir/file.txt > > > > Extra options can go on the end. > > > > Also I'd probably avoid ';' just in case bash goes anywhere near it. > Sure, those are requred. But say we have two optional things, like user > and domain, as in smb:server:share:user:domain. But what do we then do > if user is unset, but domain isn't. I guess one could do > smb:server:share::domain. Still, it requires very specific handling of > each type of share with a specified option order etc. A key=value > approach is more generic. I suppose ~/.vfs/smb:$server:$share/dir/file.txt:option=$value:option=$value is a workable compromise. It might even be what Damon was indicating. Now that we're picking on details, I'd say that .vfs or .gvfs would be a better base directory than .mounts too. -- Hans Petter _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
