Quim Gil wrote: > We are working hard in order to have a revamped wgo by the GNOME 2.18 > release. Would you mind waiting until the new site is out? This > problem will be fixed there. Personally I putting all my time in the > wgo revamp and I haven't touched the current cvs/svn based wgo since > ages. > > Thank you for your understanding. > > On 2/24/07, Guy Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Vincent Untz wrote: >> > Hi Guy, >> > >> > Le dimanche 11 février 2007, à 21:13, Guy Johnston a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I've noticed on the home page of the GNOME site, that it reads "GNOME >> >> offers an easy to understand desktop for your Linux or UNIX computer." >> >> The use of the name 'Linux' here is clearly referring to the whole >> >> GNU/Linux operating system, rather than just the Linux kernel. As the >> >> GNOME project is committed to the goals of the free software movement, >> >> and is part of the GNU project (as far as I know), I'd have thought >> the >> >> project leaders would prefer to use the name 'GNU/Linux' for the >> system, >> >> to properly reflect how important the roles of the GNU project and the >> >> ideals of free software are for the development of this operating >> >> system, which I assume is the most common operating system GNOME is >> used >> >> with. Therefore, please considering changing this reference to read >> >> 'GNU/Linux' instead of 'Linux'. >> > >> > We already agreed on this a few months ago: >> > >> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2006-October/msg00022.html >> > >> > We only need someone to actually do it, so I'll cc gnome-web-list. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Vincent >> > >> >> Hi, is this being fixed? I've noticed that this still seems to be a >> problem. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Guy >> -- >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/board-list >> >> >From time to time confidential and sensitive information will be >> discussed >> on this mailing list. Please take care to mark confidential >> information as >> confidential, and do not redistribute this information without >> permission. >> > >
OK that sounds good. As a different point, I'm often surprised by how many people don't know that the GNOME project is part of the GNU project (I didn't know that when I first started using GNU/Linux). I've seen GNOME used a few times in a common argument against the use of the name 'GNU/Linux', that there's so many projects that have contributed to the system that GNU doesn't deserve a mention in the name (seemingly regardless of the fact that it's the main contribution). GNOME is sometimes cited in that argument as one of the major contributions to "Linux" which "isn't anything to do with GNU". To stop as many people making that mistake, I'd also like it if the relationship between GNOME and GNU was made more clear on the website. I think that both that suggested change and the use of the name 'GNU/Linux' should be helpful to GNU and the free software movement, even if only very slightly, particularly as GNOME is the default desktop for what seems to be the most popular GNU/Linux distribution at the moment (Ubuntu). I think that's important, as they seem to be getting pushed further and further into obscurity by the open source movement. New users of "Linux" often seem to be surprised and critical when we start talking about how their operating system relates to freedom, and something called GNU which they haven't heard of. The GPL is talked about a fair bit in the mainstream technology media nowadays, but even that's usually called an 'open source licence'. The ideals of software freedom which created it are rarely mentioned, even though its preamble discusses them quite thoroughly. Thanks, Guy _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
