We have several issues to solve in GNOME Products: - The structure of pages under GNOME Products. - The product page functionality/layout/content - The pages withy listings - The things I will find once I scan the previous points. ;)
I think it's better to start new threads for each "chapter". I'lkl be back in a minute (or two) with the structure of pages. On 2/27/07, Simone Deponti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, I'm gonna be serious now. I agree with Quim that the Products page > needs a heavy make-up, but I knew it would. What I'm more concerned about is > functionality: the look part shouldn't be hard. > > Speaking of the look part, I think we should need to fix the following > "visual bugs" (not really bugs, more... underimplementation) that actually > are present in wgo. I made up this little list by taking Mairin's mockup and > putting it side to side with my Firefox window. > > 1. Upper black bar: notice how the thin vertical line beside "Home" is much > more long than the one beside "News". That is a bug I thought I have solved > at one time, and is because the line is applied as background to the <li>, > and they don't have the correct height (and their background so starts at > the wrong height and gets cut after a few pixels) > 2. Tabs: they need to be bigger. Bigger font, more padding in all the > directions (the text is getting claustrophobic in there). Also, the template > already gives the correct "active" class to tabs, and the CSS doesn't > implement it (I love how the link color gets blue on the active tab in > Mairin mockup). Needs to be fixed > 3. The tertiary navigation bar: looked bigger and shinier in Mairin's > mockup. Here, I fear we will have to give up on bigger since we're already > low on screen real estate but, I guess we can do something on the shiny > front. And here too, we miss the active spot CSS integration. > 4. Last, that slightly vanishing grey background under the tertiary nav just > goes down a little too much, if you compare the proportions with those in > Mairin's mockups. It also goes under the content, where it generates a funny > effect (part of it gets superseded by the white background of the content) > > Note, I am not criticizing anyone's work here (cause if we look at the code > I wrote for PloneSoftwareCenter, I better shut up). Just doing a comparison > (okay, I know we can't be pixel identical, but still..). And in my opinion, > our implementation loses 60% of Mairin's mockup visual impact. > > I'm willing to take up task 1 and get it done asap, and after that, well, > we'll see ;). > > I'm eager to hear opinions and why not, help offers :P. > > Good night everyone > > PS Mairin, I know I horribly misspelled your name throughout this mail. I'm > sorry. As excuse, I can say I just can't find that i with an open accent on > an italian keyboard. Apparently here in Italy we abhor such characters. > > > > -- > Simone Deponti > ------------------------------------------- > - Oh wait, which ones are we Linux guys again, Rebels or Empire? > - Microsoft is the Empire. Apple is the Rebels. We are the Ewoks. -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
