Hi, 2007/7/2, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 7/2/07, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Comments? > > YES! > > Youwent deeper than I when going through > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/DeveloperGnomeOrg but your immediate > conclusions wer mostly the same. (see the "Tasks" section)
Indeed. > Can you please take that wiki page and update it with your own findings? Done. I added my content analysis under the "Current Content Analysis" section. > At the end 2 relatively simple steps would bring a no-way-back progress: > > - Reformatted dgo homepage explaining the situation and linking to the > relevant pages in&out dgo. I would say that we need a warning in dgo homepage anyway. The reformatting part is a good-to-have thing. I don't think we should spent too much time working on dgo anymore. > - Visible banner in the header of all dgo pages saying this info is > outdated and linking to the dgo home. Yes. > The ultimate solution depends on library.gnome.org release, though. A first version of library.g.o is planned for 2.20 (according to GNOME Roadmap). GUADEC will be a wonderful opportunity for us to discuss and agree on a plan for the migration of the relevant content from dgo to there. Cheers! --lucasr _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
