Murray, I deeply regret if I made impression of any kind of "thought police". All I wanted was clarity and unambiguity (=unequivocalness).
Regards, Sergey On Nov 15, 2007 4:13 PM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 08:12 -0300, Bruno Boaventura wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > That is a legitimate approach, and it can be helpful as you say. > > > However, those precise words are subject to the reading, not intended, > > > which Sergey saw in them. Perhaps a rewording, or a link to > > > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html, > > > would help clarify this. > > > > I have the same thought. A link to www.opensource.org can bring out > > the idea: "Free Software" = "Open Source". > > I would prefer GNOME to officially withdraw from GNU rather than be > repeatedly subject to the thought police. We happily represent a range > of opinions and can't possibly be forced to forever avoid any mention of > something that you don't agree with and/or be forced to promote exactly > what you think is important this week in exactly the words that you > dictate to us. No, I don't want to argue with you about it. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.murrayc.com > www.openismus.com > > _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
