> > I think you're assuming that developers would follow a brainstorm > > site. Don't want to be negative, but I don't believe that would > > always be the case. If such a site would be available, it should be > > made very clear that it is nothing more than an indication for > > developers. Agree.
I don't think every developer will follow this, especailly discussions about ideas could get pretty long [0] and reading them might take longer than implementing the idea itself. There is a need for really strong guidelines and moderators. If you got topic like "linux is NOT user friendly enough" or "better music player" you don't win anything.... Maybe a list what will not be implemented and what kind of request are useless to fill anyway also should be made. > This is clear. And the results of the brain storming could be include > in a launchpad or wiki to develop the ideas. I think it should be integrated with the roadmaps of the gnome projects so users can see what is actually planed to be implemented and when - while for the developer easing the maintaince of project roadmaps[0] (those pages are a mess right now) Some more brainstorming about this... - rate / group / tag comments feature so developers can faster find what they are interested in (thinking of slashdot) - force the user to search for similar ideas before creating a new one - integrate bugzilla but clearly say discussion there should be focused on implementation / developer talk Florian [0] http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/94/ [1] http://live.gnome.org/Home?action=fullsearch&context=180&value=roadmap&titlesearch=Titles _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
