2008/10/5 Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Another problem with syndicated content is that each source will have >> different conten licenses. Also if you link to outside sources you are >> actually loosing visitors.
FFS. Our goal is not some magical content maximization scheme. We're just trying to get news out. (Not to mention that the whole reason news.gnome.org is now a planet-like aggregator is because we suck at creating our own news feeds.) >> So I think news.gnome.org should work more on >> content it owns and can choose the license it wishes. The current site >> states that the content listes above is copyrighted by the GNOME >> project, while linked blog entries like >> http://www.lbtechservices.com/blog/2007/09/27/future-of-lat/ explicitly >> state: "(c) 2008, Loren Bandiera's weblog. All Rights Reserved." > > Per the Berne convention, stuff is automatically copyrighted. An > additional copyright mention doesn't add any additional value. > > IIRC All Rights Reserved is frowned upon. Best not to use it. It is... not in keeping with our goals. > news.gnome.org in above stuff is nothing different than any of the other > planets. The copyrighted by GNOME might make it confusing, but that is > something for some legal person to guide. The 'copyright (c) GNOME' language should definitely go from both p.g.o and n.g.o. I recommend replacing with: 'All syndicated content (c) the original authors.' Luis _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
