Carsten Senger schrieb: >> >> That is as vague as one can be. > > What can I say after two days studing code, the poor documentation and > the requirements.
Well take into account that this is talked about since 2006. I did not mean you personally. I think the activity and talk we now see looks promising. I think its sometimes good if people become impatient - those who worked on Plone also are motivated through expectations. If nobody is expecting anything stagnation is the result. So I am positive about the current attitude. > It's clear that you don't expect any success from our efforts and I > can't promise you one. Wrong. Its rather the expectation to get some more concrete timetable soon. I think nobody can really like to see all that work being wasted, nor do I. I think the best thing would be to have some working beta ASAP. As I am no Plone expert and always found it complicated I cant really help in any groundwork. I would be willing to transfer some content at the point where its workable. I would also vote to release it earlier even if it lacks some minor tuning. Why? Because its better if new pages are using a CMS as that we would have to transfer more content. Regards, Thilo _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
