I agree that CC-SA 3.0 is the best solution. The issue is in re-licensing all of the existing content, which may not be possible due to having to get each writer / editors permission. Anyone have any insight on how Wikipedia did it?
Paul 2009/8/4 Javier Jardón <[email protected]> > Hello, > > I think this is my first message here so hello everyone! > > I'd like to discuss about the license of the Gnome wiki content. > > I think that would be good set a license by default to the > live.gnome.org content. > So, this should do more easy and clear share the contents of the wiki. > (If you don't specify any license, you have all the rigths of the > content) > > I think CC-by-sa 3.0 would be a good choice, because it has already > been choosen by our doc team for new documentation. (and by important > sites, like wikipedia) > > Best regards, > > -- > Javier Jardón Cabezas > _______________________________________________ > gnome-web-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list >
_______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
