On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 13:35, Paul Cutler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 11:54 +0000, Lucas Rocha wrote: >> Hi Jaap, >> >> 2010/2/20 Jaap A. Haitsma <[email protected]>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Maybe I missed a part of a discussion somewhere but the page says "The >> > GNOME live images contain the latest and greatest GNOME software" >> > but we are offering images based on GNOME 2.26 which is almost a year >> > old. So it's not really latest and greatest. >> > >> > Wouldn't it be better to offer latest live release of Ubuntu, Fedora >> > etc. Maybe even the development releases of those distros such that >> > people can really test the latest and greates >> >> Maybe we could ping the right people to get updated images with the >> latest GNOME release. I agree we should just point to live releases of >> major distros in case we don't manage to get our own updated images. >> >> Volunteering to take this task? :-) >> >> --lucasr > > > Sorry, I should have mentioned it: I pinged Ken VanDine mid-last week, > and he is going to work with Zhang Sen next who is the new maintainer of > the GNOME live images created on the rPath platform. (I also copied > Vincent Untz as a backup plan if we need to move to the SUSE Build > Service instead). > > I'm hopeful we'll have 2.30 images available at release. >
What's the reason we promote these images or foresight linux instead of live CDs/images of Ubuntu, Fedora etc? Jaap _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
