On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:17:00PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > You could branch at patch-2006 and start re-importing the changeset to > see whether you get the same error, but I doubt. > Now that I look at this more, it seems like there are a _lot_ of changesets that simply have no file modifications. While this in itself isn't a problem, there seem to be quite a few legitimate cases that are just dropped (this seems to have just been one isolated example).
For instance, I can find a range of something like 50 consecutive changesets where there have been nothing checked in but a patch log. > I will update the wiki with a new script. I also added couple of lines > to automatically cache the revision if there is a symbolic name for it > in the ChangeSet,v file (i.e. for any full or -rc release). > > Thanks for taking the time to look into this problem, > Ok, I will probably just end up wiping my tree entirely and starting over with your updated script. This seems to be the least painful way of going for the moment, as I have no idea what the extent of the damage is presently. If you are interersted in debugging this further, I can back up my tree somewhere for you to fetch, though I don't know how useful this will be.
pgp40EXGPt8fw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
