On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:26:30PM +0600, Ivan Boldyrev wrote: > > If someone finds a second pre-image attack against md5, then arch > > will be in trouble (but so will just about anything else). > > MD5 is considered insecure for many years. Arch is already in trouble > because Arch developers do not understand security. > > I am not security expert too, but designing security attack against > Arch took less time than writing this message.
This is pure nonsense. Go away and read /Beyond Fear/, and maybe /Secrets & Lies/ as well. And CRYPTO-GRAM too, while you're at it. I've seen journalists with better comprehension of security. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
