On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 12:28:04PM -0500, Deliverable Mail wrote: > Once I started to look at tla, I see mentions of larch, baz, ArX, > and some others.
All this is AFAIK... please forgive and correct me if I say anything wrong. :) larch was the original arch, written by Tom in shell scripts and external programs (diff, patch, etc.). It's slower and outdated now but allowed for rapid development and prototyping of what eventually became tla. I think it used the same archive format. Its relation to tla is ancestral in standards only; the code has been rewritten. tla is arch proper. 'Nuff said. :) I'm not sure where ArX split from Arch, but I believe it arose due to philosophical differences between Tom and the ArX forker. It's essentially unrelated to tla at this point. baz is a Canonical fork of tla, and as I recall, there was initially some resentment on the part of Tom as to how they handled the split. However, it also seems to have received some blessing as a faster- moving testing ground for tla, and I heard that its new archive format and several other changes will make their way into arch. > There're also references to a legacy arch. Sounds like larch... > How did tla come to become the GNU Arch? This I don't know, since I don't know how any software is adopted by the FSF as 'GNU'. > And what is the deal with the clones, they seem to splinter the > development and attention of those researching a new versioning > system... Not really. In baz's case, it's actually helping, from what I understand. ArX is probably the only thing relatively unhelpful to 'GNU Arch', but that's to be expected when two different people want to take their respective projects in different directions. > I'd like to see a statement from GNU on the "State of the Arches", > and/or at least "a view from the tla project," since when you start > looking at it, it's not immediately obvious who's the original, larch -> tla, > who's the clone, ArX, baz, > which is the viable and safe bet to use for the long term. tla first, baz a close second, IMO.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
