I didn't try baz 1.3 preview, but I would like to know about the status of several issues.
1) Don't you think "tree-id" command is misnamed? Use "tree-rev" name if you feel "tree-revision" is not short enough (I don't feel so). 2) The flat-revision subdirectory structure in ~/.arch-cache leads to huge directories, this is not scalable. Is not version/patchlevel structure more balanced and more consistent? 3) Is the problem of mixed stdout and stderr in some commands fixed? (For example, in commit after import, half of "* messages" go to stdout and half to stderr.) The tla behaviour is better; stderr is for errors. Regards, Mikhael. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
