On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 14:29 +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > > for large projects. I have to confess that multi-GB libraries for a > > > project that is ~50MB of untarred source seemed a but much. > > > > Unless you're using a non-sparse library, there's no reason why it take > > more than the size of the source tree. > > Well... libraries default to being non-sparse. Add to that the > behaviour you described of preferring library revisions over cacherevs > as soon as there's an existing revision, and then libraries tend to > fill all available disk space ;)
What do you think of having libraries default to being non-sparse & greedy ? Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
