On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 19:12 +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 11:46 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote: > > > > Is it a bug that inventory -t doesn't catch "."? Or is this a design > > decision? > > Its not an explicit decision, and I think its reasonable to consider it > a bug.
My gut reaction here was "hell no!"
Then I realised that I do have several scripts around to work with
nested trees, and they all do something to add the tree-root to the
output of "inventory --nested --trees".
And I remembered the previous discussions on associating an inventory ID
to the tree-root. The tree-root used to be a bit special, but it's
actually a problem to the changeset logic.
So, yes, "inventory --trees" should list the tree-root.
Please remind me to add the test cases and necessary compatibility logic
to PyBaz when you'll do the change.
--
-- ddaa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
