Stefan Monnier wrote:
Hmmm I've never tried ReiserFS, but I've found ext3 pretty fast when working with the Emacs Arch archive. But maybe I find it fast only because my only point of comparison is the Mac OS X filesystem which *sucks rocks* when used in the same circumstance (a good 10 times slower).
This may be because the implementation of hard links under HFS+ has fairly bad performance.
http://www.opendarwin.org/pipermail/darwinports/2004-November/022708.html
Have you tried running 'tla changes' with pristines? This may be faster on HFS+.
Aaron -- Aaron Bentley Director of Technology Panometrics, Inc.
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
