On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 11:54 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:38:16PM +0200, Jan Hudec wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:30:20 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > [XML inexact patching] > > > > > > In fact, I do think it's possible. But to be really useful [...] > > > For XML the equivalence is well defined. Two XML documents are > > equivalent if and only if they parse to the same tree. [...] > Ugh. I don't know whether I've brought across my point.
More specifically, XML is so semantically poor as to be almost
meaningless.
For example, the semantics of element ordering and whitespace (to a
slightly lesser extent) are application-defined.
--
-- ddaa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
